The Poison of Hafiz Saeed. ‘India is an enemy and will remain so’- Hafiz.


Now, Pro Taliban Hafiz Saeed hold forth on US aid bill. Saeed wants to promote terrorism in Pakistan. Jeopardises PakistanIndian Relation.

Banned JuD chief Hafiz Mohd Saeed has joined the debate over conditions attached to US aid to be provided to Pakistan, charging that clauses asking the country to take action against militant groups had been included due to “Indian pressure”. Saeed, mastermind of the Mumbai terror attacks, told a congregation at Friday prayers at the JuD mosque at Chauburji in Lahore that the US had included clauses in the Kerry-Lugar bill asking Pakistan to take action against militant groups in Quetta and Muridke “due to pressure from India”.

He, however, claimed the people will not allow this to happen. “The people of Pakistan and the army will not allow anyone to launch attacks on Quetta or Muridke. We will resist them,” he said. The JuD has its headquarters at Muridke, about 40 km from Lahore.

Saeed, also the founder of the Lashker-e-Taiba, demanded that the government should not offer a hand of friendship to India as it is an “enemy and will remain so”.

He also lashed out at the Pakistan government for “enslaving” the country by “accepting the tough” conditions in the Kerry-Lugar bill. “Reject the bill and trust god,” he said. Saeed appreciated the military’s decision to express concern over the Kerry-Lugar bill. The army’s top commanders said earlier this week that the clauses in the bill could affect Pakistan’s national security interests.

 The JuD chief has stepped up his criticism of India and the US since police in Faisalanad registered two First Information Reports against him under the Anti-Terrorism Act for inciting people to wage jehad or holy war against infidels and for seeking funds for his banned group.

 Though police officials gave an impression last month that Saeed had been placed under house arrest in connection with these two cases, it later came to light that no formal order had been issued for his detention.

 Police officials have also said that law enforcement agencies had only enhanced Saeed’s security in view of reported threats to him.

 Though Saeed was put under house arrest in December last year after the UN Security Council declared the JuD a terrorist group, he was freed on the orders of the Lahore High Court in June.



Leaving sanity !!

With thousands that continue to die so harrowingly in bomb blasts and suicide attacks year after year, Pakistanis still consider terrorism to be a secondary problem?

By Nadeem F. Paracha
Friday, 09 Oct, 2009

         As the country’s electronic media and drawing-rooms buzz with the ins and outs of the Kerry-Lugar Bill, yet another suicide terrorist attack ripped through the already devastated and blood-soaked streets of Peshawar. 

Some would say such attacks were imminent in the light of the Army’s affirmative action against barbarians called the Taliban, and especially after the leader of Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan’s leader, Baitullah Mehsud was killed in a drone attack last month, but there is no justification whatsoever for the knee-jerk manner the mainstream Pakistani media handles such a threat. 

The question is, why in the face of such a threat and destruction do we casually steer away our intellectual and emotional energies towards abstract and rhetorical issues such as ‘sovereignty’ and ‘self-reliance,’ when we as a nation have exhibited such helplessness in addressing and arresting the more tangible threat and issue of mass terrorism? 

Debates about lofty ideals and desires of national autonomy and ‘ghairat’ seem rather frivolous and hollow in a country imprisoned by its own delusional pretensions of being a ‘nuclear Islamic power;’ always trapped and forcibly obliged to flex its withering muscles against big bad superpowers, while behaving like utter cowards and false supermen when it comes to the question of terrorism. 

Over and over again, many Pakistanis, their politicians, their glorified media personalities and holy men have tried to ignore the issue, treating it as a secondary phenomenon compared to the ‘more pressing issue’ of Asif Ali Zardari’s wealth, Altaf Hussain’s self-imposed exile and Meera’s domestic ordeal – as if trying their level best to obscure the issue of terrorism only because the bloodshed that takes place in the name of God might ridicule the already ridiculous notions of political Islam that the state of Pakistan has been flaunting for so many years now. 

To defend all that started to socially and politically de-evolve in the spheres of religion, state and society during the Zia-ul-Haq dictatorship in the 1980s, a number of lunatics in the shape of discarded politicians, conspiracy theorists, TV anchors and maulvies can be heard loudly distracting the people’s attention from the threat that Pakistan faces from within. They either start blaming imagined intrigues plotted outside Pakistan or they shamelessly start defending murderers and barbarians as helpless and hapless consequences of poverty and injustice.

Can’t we already see that it is these lunatics that continue to be given vital space in the mainstream media to go on glorifying the ‘brave deeds’ of the barbarians, going as far as (rather audaciously) linking these deeds with us Pakistanis’ oh-so-noble cry for sovereignty?

With thousands that continue to die so harrowingly in bomb blasts and suicide attacks year after year, Pakistanis still consider terrorism to be a secondary problem?

Are we mad? That’s what it seems. The gruesome insanity of sectarian clashes and terrorism in the fine name of God across the last three decades is bound to have impacted our collective sense of sanity. By tomorrow each one of us who is not apparently a bearded maniac, will forget about this attack and tragedy as well, and move back to our fixation with imagined enemies and the political soap operas that we love to create about famous politicians.  

Within a matter of days, we will jump from silently watching the devastation of the blast on the TV, to cursing Zionists, Hindus and the Americans, to cracking jokes about Meera and eventually nodding in thoughtless appreciation the hatred and the accepted forms of psychosis spouted and exhibited by harebrained showmen whom we call ‘scholars,’ ‘analysts’ and ‘preachers.’  

We all know about the why’s and who’s of terrorism in Pakistan. And yet, those who were lucky to survive terrorist attacks, or those whose loved ones were maimed so mercilessly in these attacks, we will go on wagging our fingers telling them they died because we are not good Muslims, or they died because certain elusive enemies of Islam are out to destroy our country and religion. 

Those willing to point out the real perpetrators will at once be denounced as being western puppets and agents of anti-Pakistan/Islam elements. It is as if the few who are ready to speak out the truth in this respect, loiter among a milieu of mass delusion and denial, and a society that has collapsed from being a neurotic mess to becoming an almost incurable bundle of noble-sounding psychosis. Couple this state of being with a collective love affair we have with nuclear devises, all I can say is God have mercy on us all. 

Tags: , , , , ,

One Response to “The Poison of Hafiz Saeed. ‘India is an enemy and will remain so’- Hafiz.”

  1. Gulistan Khan Says:

    Myths and facts about Kerry-Lugar bill

    By Our Correspondent
    Saturday, 10 Oct, 2009

    No oversight of transfers, promotions in army: Kerry WASHINGTON: US Senator John Kerry, one of the co-authors of the Enhanced Partnership with Pakistan Act, has issued a list of ‘myths and facts’ about the proposed legislation also known as the Kerry-Lugar bill.

    This is how he explained the bill:

    Myth: The $7.5 billion authorised by the bill comes with strings attached for the people of Pakistan.

    Fact: There are no conditions on Pakistan attached to these funds. There are, however, strict measures of financial accountability on these funds that Congress is imposing on the US executive branch — not the Pakistani government, to make sure the money is being spent properly and for the purposes intended.

    Such accountability measures have been welcomed by Pakistani commentators to ensure that funds meant for schools, roads and clinics actually reach the Pakistani people and are not wasted.

    Myth: The bill impinges on Pakistan’s sovereignty.

    Fact: Nothing in the bill threatens Pakistani sovereignty.

    Myth: The bill places onerous conditions on US military aid to Pakistan that interfere in Pakistan’s internal affairs and imply that Pakistan supports terrorism and nuclear proliferation.

    Fact: The conditions on military aid reinforce the stated policy of the government of Pakistan, major Pakistani opposition parties, and the Pakistani military and are the basis of bilateral cooperation between the United States and Pakistan.

    Myth: The bill requires US oversight on promotions and other internal operations of the Pakistani military.

    Fact: There is absolutely no such requirement or desire.

    Myth: The bill expands the Predator programme of drone attacks on targets within Pakistan.

    Fact: There is absolutely nothing in the bill related to drones.

    Myth: The bill funds activities within Pakistan by private US security firms, such as Dyncorp and Blackwater/Xe.

    Fact: The bill does not include any language on private US security firms. The issue of how private security firms operate in Pakistan has nothing to do with this bill. The laws governing such firms —which are employed by many US embassies and consulates throughout the world — are not affected by this bill in any way.

    Myth: The bill aims for an expanded US military footprint in Pakistan.

    Fact: The bill does not provide a single dollar for US military operations. All of the money authorised in this bill is for non-military, civilian purposes.

    Myth: The United States is expanding its physical footprint in Pakistan, using the bill as a justification for why the US Embassy in Islamabad needs more space and security.

    Fact: As the US Embassy in Islamabad works diligently over the next five years to properly distribute the $7.5 billion to the people of Pakistan, it will need to take into account its own personnel and security needs to make sure it has the right staff with the right expertise on hand. This is common sense.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: